<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1605" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV>Hi All , reading the message about exposure ....</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just my 2 cents experience like DP ... and i shoot a lot of feets per week
...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have exposed films outdated of 20 years .... i first do a small test in a
Nikon slr .... so i can determine the new sensitivity </DIV>
<DIV>for exemple an ORWO BW film "process before 1987 ..... of 100 ASA , i
finnish expose it at 6 ASA Daylight !: BUT IT WORK !!!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Other ways .... </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sometimes : i over-expose 1 1/2 stop the neg and Pull process One stop
(this reduce contrast a little bit ...)</DIV>
<DIV>Sometimes i Under-expose 1 or 2 stop and Push process (this is called
"pushing" ) so you can have 1000 or 2000 ASA with Vision3 500T ! </DIV>
<DIV>so i take the emulsion like 1000 ASA (when it is 500ASA) and expose it like
1000 ASA .... </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have done too Cross Process : with reversal 16mm processed in Negative
chemical (in this case i Overexpose 1/2 stop) </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>remember the comercial of the Birth of a Junky Child .... ???? i place the
youtube link to the group ...</DIV>
<DIV><A
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auBf8Wf_RZM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auBf8Wf_RZM</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>this was 500 ASA Bleach bypass and push one stop : total 1600 ASA in my
lightmeter ....(1 stop for 1000 asa and 2/3 for the BBP process) </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>CONCLUSION : ASA indice is a reference ..... many thinks can be done
...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just for the Histroy : i do 23 years ago my Filmschool tesis about : ALL
film emulsion NEVER used to shoot .... I have done Keylights , and regular
prints of ALL </DIV>
<DIV>Laboratories Emulsions, like Interpositive, Internegatives, Dubs Pos, Dubs,
Negs , Hi contrast, Soundfilms , ST8 , Key Films , etc, etc .... around 60
stranges films you cannot find in the Kodak clients lists films for shootings,
somes had 12 asa, somes had1 ASA !!! but all give me amazing images !!!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>BEST, Olivier .</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Speedbirdmgh@aol.com
href="mailto:Speedbirdmgh@aol.com">Speedbirdmgh@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cinema@konvas.org
href="mailto:cinema@konvas.org">cinema@konvas.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 12, 2008 6:24
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Konvas] OT - radio
mics</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>"True audiophiles (like Rita!) would probably cringe at
these"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Samson produce incredible value for money radio mics especially if match
to Audio -Technica transducers and will produce great results in most
situations.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Senheisser radio packs at $10,000 a set will run for 18 hours a day for 5
years non-stop and will re-sell at</DIV>
<DIV>$5,000-$6,000 in 5 years time so its a matter of performance against
economics. I also have some Transtec's which have been running for 10
years albeit for only 10 hours a week and only cost $500.00 a
pair secondhand and are extremely tolerent to radio frequency
interference. So in principle cheaper equipment can achieve the same
results,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>When they pay you $1200.00 a day plus expenses they do expect the best
there is although they would'nt know if it is good or bad until it fails then
there would be know more work.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If you strive for outstanding images then great sound should support
them.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just my theory anyway. It is true though,cheaper equipment can
produce great results.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Rita</DIV></DIV></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>Cinema mailing
list<BR>Cinema@konvas.org<BR>http://konvas.org - All about Konvas, Kinor and
other Russian Cinema Cameras<BR><BR>Be sure to Check out the online
Forums:<BR>http://konvas.org/forum/index.php<BR><BR>Visit the discussion
archives:<BR>http://konvas.org/list-archives.html<BR><BR>Join the Konvas
Discussion List:
<BR>http://konvas.org/mailman/listinfo/cinema_konvas.org<BR><BR>Please be kind
when replying and crop the replied message!!!<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>