[Konvas] NEXT Tarentino WESTERN

[colcam at aim.com]

Having spent a few decades in completion bond I am very, very aware of costs, delivered product, and what it makes the image on the screen the image on the screen.  This movie has nothing to do with doing it the right way or wrong way, it has to do with catch phrases, marketing, and selling "a concept of delivery" to those who buy into parroting the copywriter.  

This is all about marketing. 

If you get right down to it, it has always been all about marketing, but in this case they seek to reel in those who love the medium, hoping they do not realize that the emperor has no clothes.  The larger film image means you can get greater depth of field for a given angle of view-- remember the math that your image rides on?  Scan and play with the image, making the contrast between colors greater and you get the old Technicolor look, more or less, but make sure you have huge sections of monochrome to keep the budget down, and hype it like crazy. 

This is a marketing exploitation of those who love film-- and it is going to continue the loud, bold colors, the lack of real storytelling, the choppy bright and in your face display.   It could have been shot as well or better with 35mm anamorphic, exposure timed and color timed to perfection and told the story-- but look at it and you'll see hype and splash and choppy colors. 

It is a parody of the business and the art by someone who pushes to see what he can get away with before he has to take a ton of money and try something else.  

Look at it, don't just worship it.

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Overtoom <overtoom at mac.com>

Colcam, we are looking forward to see your film, done the "right" way!  Until then I will have to be content with Tarantino's cheap and easy version :)

Sent from where I am, to where you are... through a series of tubes

> On Nov 28, 2015, at 12:28 PM, colcam at aim.com wrote:
> 
> Modification of a camera body to accept older lenses means they took the CHEAP WAY OUT not something they believed in, they just settled for the cheapest way to do it.  Price new lenses, or even modification of several lenses to fit existing body types.  Modification of a body is cheaper than modification of one lens.
> 
> The look you froth over is what happens when large chunks of film are scanned at extreme high resolution and then processed through a full digital suite-- you are worshiping film strained through a digital intermediate to tweak colors and contrast.  That is how you get that great, snappy color, not some magical old lens and film stock being super duper stuff of all stuff. 
> 
> 
> It is marketing being used to sell tickets, the image on the screen is an afterthought. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: photones <photones at juno.com>
> 
> Panavision believed in it enough to modify a camera to accept the older lenses that hadn't been used since 1965. That has to count for something. So even if it is a resurrection it functions.....no? 
> 
> ..